|
Analysis and Interpretation by Michael A. Cassel
On July 24, 2019, the Third District Court of Appeals released their decision in State Farm Florida Insurance Company v. Charles and Diana Sanders,[1] (hereinafter "Sanders"). The Sanders opinion discusses whether a public adjuster can act as a disinterested appraiser.
3 Comments
Hillary Cassel and Michael Cassel have both been named as 2019 Rising Stars by Super Lawyers Magazine. This marks the third consecutive year for Michael and fifth consecutive year for Hillary.
The law firm of Cassel & Cassel, P.A., has expanded by adding two additional attorneys to the practice. Founded by Hillary Cassel and Michael Cassel, Cassel & Cassel, P.A., is a boutique firm dedicated solely to the representation of residential and commercial policyholders in property damage insurance claims from pre-suit assistance to litigation through trial.
Joining their practice are attorneys Christy Brigman and Sarah Licona. Analysis and Interpretation by Michael A. Cassel
On May 8, 2019, the Fourth District Court of Appeals released their decision in Hershel Bryant and Betty Bryant v. GeoVera Specialty Insurance Company (hereinafter "Bryant"). The Bryant opinion discusses the payment of an appraisal award in suit operating as a confession of judgment and serving to ripen bad faith as well as the denial of payment operating as a waiver of compliance with post-loss conditions – namely the proof of loss requirement. Analysis and Interpretation by Michael A. Cassel
On April 17, 2019, the Third District Court of Appeals released their decision in Jose Alvarez and Hilda Alvarez v. State Farm Florida Insurance Company (hereinafter "Alvarez"). The Alvarez opinion discusses whether a verdict in favor the insureds should be invalidated based on the jury’s finding that the insureds intentionally and materially misrepresented the extent of the loss. Analysis and Interpretation by Michael A. Cassel
On April 17, 2019, the Third District Court of Appeals released their decision in Safepoint Insurance Company v. Daisy Sousa (hereinafter "Sousa"). The Sousa opinion discusses the requirement of compliance with post-loss conditions, namely the request for a Sworn Proof of Loss (hereinafter “SPOL”), prior to the ripeness of appraisal. As many of you know, Michael Cassel, along with Paul Del Vecchio from PJDCCI, presented at the Windstorm Insurance Network ("WIND") 2019 Conference in Orlando, Florida, regarding building code compliance along with a number of related areas of law and coverage.
Michael Cassel is scheduled to speak at the Windstorm Insurance Network ("WIND") 2019 Conference in Orlando, Florida.
Analysis and Interpretation by Michael A. Cassel
On July 25, 2018, the Fourth District Court of Appeals released their decision in Andrea Tracey and James Tracey v. People's Trust Insurance Company, (hereinafter "Tracey"). The Tracey opinion discusses the ability for an appraisal panel to determine causation for a denied portion of a claim when the claim has not been denied in its entirety. Hillary Cassel and Michael Cassel have both been named as 2018 Rising Stars by Super Lawyers Magazine. This marks the second consecutive year for Michael and fourth consecutive year for Hillary.
|
Attorney BlogArchives
August 2019
Categories |
RSS Feed
All Rights Reserved · © 2019 CASSEL & CASSEL, P.A. · Attorney Advertising
DISCLAIMER: The information contained on this website is intended as general information only and does not constitute, nor should it be taken as, legal advice. No information contained on this website should be relied upon without consulting with an attorney licensed to practice in the jurisdiction in which your matter arises. Laws and legal requirements change frequently and are subject to revision and interpretation. We make no representation, warranty, or claim that the information contained on this website is up to date. We are not responsible for any errors or omissions in the resources or information available at or from this website. The accounts of recent trials, verdicts, settlements, or results contained in this website are intended to illustrate the experience of the law firm. Prospective clients may not obtain the same or similar results as each case is unique and results will differ based on the particular facts and law applicable in each case. Nothing contained on this website constitutes a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of a specific legal matter. The services discussed on this website may not be available in all jurisdictions. The attorney responsible for this website is Michael Cassel, Esq.